WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court will have the final say on whether war preparation trumps whale protection.
Acting at the Bush administration's urging, the court agreed Monday to review a federal appeals court ruling that limited the use of sonar in naval training exercises off Southern California's coast because of its potential to harm marine mammals.
Sonar, which the Navy relies on to locate enemy submarines, can interfere with whales' ability to navigate and communicate. There is also evidence that the technology has caused whales to strand themselves on shore.
The Navy argues that the decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco jeopardizes its ability to train sailors and Marines for service in wartime in exchange for a limited environmental benefit. The Navy says it has already taken steps to protect beaked whales, dolphins and other creatures in balancing war training and environmental protections, officials said.
The Supreme Court case could settle the issue.
"If they rule in the Navy's favor, it would go a long ways to assuring the balance between environmental stewardship and national security," said Vice Admiral Samuel J. Locklear, commander of the U.S. Third Fleet in San Diego, which is leading the training exercises.
Locklear said the restrictions placed on the Navy by the court have shut down effective training and are "putting sailors and Marines in danger and our national security at stake."
The Natural Resources Defense Council, one of five advocacy groups that sued the Navy over the issue, contends that more needs to be done to make sure sonar is not harming marine wildlife.
"This will decide whether or not the Navy is fulfilling its security goals in a way that doesn't leave massive collateral damage," said William Rossiter, president of Cetacean Society International, another plaintiff in the case.
The science is inconclusive, but there is evidence that sonar affects marine mammals. The Navy's own environmental assessment of using sonar during the 14 training exercises off the California coast found that it could disturb or harm an estimated 170,000 marine mammals, including possible temporary hearing loss in at least 8,000 whales.
Five whales have been stranded and 37 whales have died because of sonar since 1996, the Navy says.
Scientists say it is often difficult to link harm or injury to sonar tests, and the court will likely decide before the science is conclusive.
"It's a lot harder to know just how many mammals may or may not be affected by different sounds," said Tim Ragen, executive director of the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission. As a scientist, Ragen has studied the effect of noise on beaked whales.
An injunction by a federal judge in Los Angeles early this year created a 12-nautical-mile no-sonar zone along the coast and ordered the Navy to shut off all sonar use within 2,200 yards of a marine mammal. That prompted President Bush to step in and sign a waiver exempting the Navy from a section of the Coastal Zone Management Act so training could continue as the government appealed the decision. Only two of the 14 training exercises still need to be completed, the Navy said.
The 9th Circuit sided with the lower court and said the Navy must abide by the injunction. However, while the litigation was under way the appeals court gave the Navy permission to use sonar closer than the restrictions allow during critical maneuvers.